Your cart is empty.
Your cart is empty.
This material is designed and intended to provide general information in summary form on legal topics, current at the time of publication, for general informational purposes only. This is not legal advice.
The best way to protect your rights at work is to join your union. There is a union for almost every worker. You can find out what union covers you by calling Australian Unions on 1300 486 466 or following this link: www.australianunions.org.au/factsheet/which-is-the-union-for-you/
Introduction
Restraint of trade clauses (ROTs) are terms in a contract between a worker and a business that are designed to restrict a worker’s conduct, especially once the worker stops working for the business.
ROTs can be divided into three categories:
These clauses can overlap, or be called different things in different employment contracts.
Can my employer enforce a Restraint of Trade clause?
The starting position is that ROTs are unlawful or invalid.
However, restraints can be lawful if:
What are ‘legitimate interests’?
Legitimate interests can include:
In addition to identifying the legitimate business interest, the employer must also be able to show that the person they are seeking to restrain has some ability or knowledge to damage relationships, expose confidential information, or encourage other employees to leave.
In other words, the risk that an employee might harm those legitimate business interests cannot be theoretical; there must be a legitimate risk that damage to the business will occur if a restraint clause is not enforced.
What is ‘reasonably required’?
A restraint of trade clause can only restrain conduct that is reasonably necessary to protect a legitimate interest. It will depend on:
What if my employer says that I have breached the ROT clause in my employment contract?
Ultimately, to enforce a ROT clause, an employer must go to court and obtain what is called an injunction to stop you from doing anything that might breach the ROT clause. This is an expensive exercise for an employer to undertake, and they must be able to convince the court that the ROT is both protecting a legitimate business interest, and that the restraint is reasonably required.
The Federal Government has recently announced that it plans to ban ROT clauses in employment contracts for workers earning less than the high income threshold (currently $190,100 as of July 2026). The Government has said that it plans to introduce these laws around July 2027.
What if I have been unfairly dismissed?
In general, it is unlikely that an employer who has found to have unfairly dismissed an employee can rely upon a ROT to stop that employee working elsewhere.
Restraint of Trade clauses in employment contracts can be long and complex. The Working Women’s Centre SA has limited availability to provide advice on ROT clauses. If we are unable to offer an appointment, we can provide you with further information on where to find a private lawyer.
Last updated: 30 September 2026